The RH Universal is a derivative of the pilot 2nd
generation RH amplifier project – the RH88. When I was working on the 2nd
generation design, my main goal was stunning simplicity and lowest possible parts
count. The concept was tested on 6550 tubes, both tetrode and triode connected,
confirming in practice the auspicious simulation results, and showing that
there is no difference in sound between triode and tetrode connection, except
for the lower power obtainable in triode mode. While this makes operation of
tetrode/pentode tubes in triode mode just a waste of available power, it does
however open the possibility to adopt the 2nd generation circuit
with triodes, as in the pilot project RH300B.
The 2nd generation circuit however requires
relatively high voltages, basically excluding many possible driver tubes and
making it unsuitable for many output tubes. The original RH Universal pushes
this concept to the limit by making it possible to create adequate operating
conditions for a range of tetrode/pentode tubes: with a fixed current draw,
anode voltage is simply adjusted by means of changing rectifier type. Thus a
wide range of output tubes can be used to full output power – at the expense of
strict driver tube limitation (ECC81, eventually ECC82), and low input
sensitivity. While low input sensitivity should not be a problem when a good
active preamp is used, the driver inflexibility is in stark contrast with the
output tube universality.
With a couple of modifications to the original RH Universal
circuit, here comes a version 2 – now (almost) totally universal! The basic
differences are:
- Application of 1st generation driver circuitry – the classic anode resistor returns, allowing more freedom in operation to the driver tube which is not limited by the swing of the output tube.
- Adjustable Rfb allowing the circuit to be perfectly tuned for the ECC81 family of double triodes (high-ish mu, relatively high transconductance) – or for the ECC83 family of double triodes (high mu, relatively low transconductance).
The advantages of this version 2 can be summarized as:
- Total universality – a very wide range of output tubes can be successfully implemented: at the flip of a switch the circuit can be optimized for either of the two different tube types, making it possible to use a wide range of tubes which fit the same socket (and pinout) type, even adding the possibility to combine tube-rolling with different operating points and feedback. Some of the now usable driver tube types may be odd, rare, or low cost types – a personal favorite of mine is a 12BZ7 used as a substitute for ECC83.
- Technical perfection (as far as possible) for the two optimized tube types, and near perfection for similar driver types, allowing for 10-11W output power at approximately 1% distortion levels (with KT88/6550). It goes without saying that maximum output power is higher… and depends on tube type.
A further advantage of the driver universality is the
possibility to make an “all octal” version of the amplifier, as 6SN7 and 6SL7
can be alternated with excellent results – and similar tubes like the Mullard
ECC35 can be used as well.
While modification of original RH Universal amplifiers is
quite simple – the basic difference is one switch and two added resistors per
channel – the v2 does not supplant the original. Besides being simpler, maybe
more elegant, the original has a slightly different sound due to the 2nd
generation driver circuit. The v2 sounds like an RH84 with lots of power, while
the original version offers a slightly different nuance to the sound. It goes
without saying that nuances are to be heard and judged based on the same
passive and active components – the output transformers, caps, and resistors
have an important sonic character which cannot be circumvented by simply
changing the active components. The perfect combination may be completely
individual, and the RH Universal allows for a wide range of active components
alternatives on the same passive platform – a range now considerably widened
with the version 2 update.
hello alex that kind of great and amazing your work, I am on progress building RH84 right now, I just wondering, how do you think about subminiature tube on RH amp ? is you ever had idea to test some subminiature tubes for your amp ? because I think subminiature tube kinda good solution for budget tubes
ReplyDeleteI wondering about sound from subminiature tubes, maybe you can tried some experiment and report here :D if you don't mind, because my knowledge are limited and also my budget.
thanks for attention comment.
You could try using subminiature tubes as drivers, provided you find tubes that have similar characteristics to an ECC81 or a 5965.
DeleteI have little experience with subminiature tubes. Since they were meant to be soldered and have no socket, this is not the best solution for a universal amp - but could work just fine provided the tube is of adequate mu and transconductance for the task.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteHello, I was wondering which modification have to make for “an all octal version” using the 6SL7. Please let me know because this is such promising SE amp.
ReplyDeleteHello,
DeletePlease read the above post carefully: what you need is to install an octal socket instead of the noval socket.
As explained in the post, you will be able to use 6SN7 and 6SL7 tubes - although the resulting operation is not going to be optimal unless you use the ECC81 as driver, the amplifier will still perform just fine.
If you have other questions, please write to me directly instead of commenting posts.
Regards,
Alex
Hi Alex. I am a newbie, and try to build my first tube amplifier. Zener usually fail shorted rather than open. Will it damage the tube?
ReplyDeleteZener diodes can fail to short, usually due to overvoltage conditions - but they can also fail to open if the current draw is higher than the diode can handle. If you install 5W zeners you will most probably never experience zener diode failure with an RH amplifier.
Delete